- BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING INSTALL
- BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING UPDATE
- BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING DRIVER
- BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING PRO
- BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING MAC
However, that may not fit your workflow, if you are interested in high speed SSD. It's my personal experience, that's why I suggest you simply connect a 850 Evo to the lower optical bay to save money. But obviously PCIe SSD is not required, then why go for a more expensive + less storage option if not required. Of course, that will require a very large HDD space.
BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING PRO
In fact, I can edit 4K Pro Res with HDD only (non RAID).
BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING MAC
My Mac run more or less with the same speed (including video editing) no matter how I connect the 840 Evo. But again, do you really need it? I have a 840 Evo, I have a Tempo SSD card (PCIe SATA III card). So, why go for the more expensive setup if you don't really need it? Of course, high sequential speed is also a big advantage. And the small files read / write performance (4K random read QD1) on a single SATA SSD (SATA II connection) is almost identical to the 4x SM951 RAID 0 setup. IMO, the main point of using SSD is the low latency, not the high sequential speed. However, that's not a good option to keep the budget low. Again, if budget is not an issue, I will tell you go for 4x SM951 512GB RAID 0 + Amfeltec card. It's highly focus on extreme sequential speed, the trade off is smaller storage and much more expensive. So, I personally will simply go for RAID 0 + proper backup.ĬIe SSD is very good, but not a balanced option. And since no matter which RAID option (including RAID 1), you still need proper backup anyway. Which make the redundancy a bit meaningless. I think RAID 5 make sense for general use, however, if using hardware RAID, and if the controller fail, there is no guarantee that you can recover the data. IMO, RAID 0 = pure speed (but increase the chance of failure), RAID 1 = keep system alive (but double the cost), RAID 5 = speed up and have some redundancy. Eventually, that mean 96GB RAM is the fastest option (because size also help).
Even though your workflow don't need that much RAM, the system can still utilise the extra RAM as cache to speed up some process. If you can source some cheap 16GB stick, I will go for 96GB. Since the 8GB stick is pretty cheap now (especially those pulled from server), I will go for at least 48GB RAM. So, in your cMP, the fastest options are 6GB, 12GB, 24GB, 48GB, 96GB. The difference is 2% or less in real world, better go for ECC. Yes, non ECC is faster, but I won't recommend it. The fastest RAM configuration in your case should be 6x (any size) 1333MHz NON ECC DDR 3 sticks.
BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING DRIVER
And make sure the web driver is avail from Nvidia BEFORE you do any OS update.
BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING INSTALL
You have to install the Nvidia web driver BEFORE you swap the 980 into your cMP.
BEST MAC TO USE FOR VIDEO EDITING UPDATE
And it may happen on every single OS update (including security update).
If you install that card in the Mac and boot, all you have is just black screen. R9 280X and GTX680 has native support from Apple, but GTX980 do NOT. Just plug that into the PCIe slot, and OSX / macOS will provide a driver to run the card. (At least post #1)Īny, "native support" means the card can run OOTB. Anyway, here is my setupĪbout "native support" and Nvidia web driver, please read through this post. And obviously it gives me more benefit than a higher speed SSD (only applicable for my usage). Since I am a FCPX user, I end up gave up the SATA III card and install a 2nd GPU there. I will suggest you go straight to the PCIe SSD but not SATA SSD + PCIE SATA III card.
PCIe SSD is very good, but not a balanced option. If money is not an issue, I will sure go for dual X5690, but that usually not a smart move (unless you can source a pair of cheap X5690).
50%), and the real world performance difference is almost negligible. The price difference between X5690 and X5680 sometimes can be very large (e.g.
0 kommentar(er)
